<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let Them Chirp Awhile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.miconian.com/2008/11/30/let-them-chirp-awhile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.miconian.com/2008/11/30/let-them-chirp-awhile/</link>
	<description>Form and function fistfight in heaven.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 06:57:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Bernhardt</title>
		<link>http://www.miconian.com/2008/11/30/let-them-chirp-awhile/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Bernhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trailersundone.com/?p=168#comment-115</guid>
		<description>hey...i think Nick is right about that, and in response to MBC - dude - most indie movies are marketed with trailers that do not reflect the actual content in an effort to bring in a broad audience. i havent seen let them chirp a while yet, but if what nick is saying is right, then, the producers of let them chirp a while are just trying to make the film seem more mainstream.

take for example that film ELEGY which was marketed as a comedy.  it&#039;s actually a really dark film, and i saw it with a friend.  the trailer made it look like a movie for baby-boomers, but it&#039;s really all about death and sex.  anyway, rarely are trailers good representations of films if the films are by a) unknown filmmakers b) first-time filmmakers  or c) if the films are about something that is sort of out of the ordinary...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey&#8230;i think Nick is right about that, and in response to MBC &#8211; dude &#8211; most indie movies are marketed with trailers that do not reflect the actual content in an effort to bring in a broad audience. i havent seen let them chirp a while yet, but if what nick is saying is right, then, the producers of let them chirp a while are just trying to make the film seem more mainstream.</p>
<p>take for example that film ELEGY which was marketed as a comedy.  it&#8217;s actually a really dark film, and i saw it with a friend.  the trailer made it look like a movie for baby-boomers, but it&#8217;s really all about death and sex.  anyway, rarely are trailers good representations of films if the films are by a) unknown filmmakers b) first-time filmmakers  or c) if the films are about something that is sort of out of the ordinary&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bennett Cohn</title>
		<link>http://www.miconian.com/2008/11/30/let-them-chirp-awhile/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bennett Cohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 20:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trailersundone.com/?p=168#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Hey Nick, thanks for reading my blog, and thanks even more for commenting.

It&#039;s true that I haven&#039;t seen the movie... the basic model of the blog is that I go ahead and review films before actually seeing them. Although I&#039;m surely often wrong, I do feel that I&#039;m accurately representing the text of the trailer as I perceive it. If the movie itself turns out to be a lot different than my interpretation, then perhaps that trailer wasn&#039;t the best possible representation of that particular film.

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nick, thanks for reading my blog, and thanks even more for commenting.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that I haven&#8217;t seen the movie&#8230; the basic model of the blog is that I go ahead and review films before actually seeing them. Although I&#8217;m surely often wrong, I do feel that I&#8217;m accurately representing the text of the trailer as I perceive it. If the movie itself turns out to be a lot different than my interpretation, then perhaps that trailer wasn&#8217;t the best possible representation of that particular film.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick S. Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.miconian.com/2008/11/30/let-them-chirp-awhile/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick S. Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 15:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trailersundone.com/?p=168#comment-116</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re all mixed up about this movie.  I saw it at Santa Fe Film Festival last year.  In the first 5 minutes it actually openly rips on Garden State which is really hilarious.  And the title comes from some Emerson Essay called &quot;Self Reliance&quot;.  it&#039;s on the official website here :

www.letthemchirpawhile.com

the movie is building on stuff from woody allen and the classic italian filmmakers (fellini, de sica) but it&#039;s pretty original actually in a lot of ways.  don&#039;t write it off based on the trailer.  it&#039;s actually a fun film</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re all mixed up about this movie.  I saw it at Santa Fe Film Festival last year.  In the first 5 minutes it actually openly rips on Garden State which is really hilarious.  And the title comes from some Emerson Essay called &#8220;Self Reliance&#8221;.  it&#8217;s on the official website here :</p>
<p><a href="http://www.letthemchirpawhile.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.letthemchirpawhile.com</a></p>
<p>the movie is building on stuff from woody allen and the classic italian filmmakers (fellini, de sica) but it&#8217;s pretty original actually in a lot of ways.  don&#8217;t write it off based on the trailer.  it&#8217;s actually a fun film</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
