Posted: September 26th, 2009 | Author: miconian | Filed under: Miconian At Large | Tags: brooklyn, kansas, phelps | View Comments
Disciples of the reverend Fred Phelps protested today outside a synagogue a few blocks from my apartment in Cobble Hill, Brooklyn. As usual, the group of protesters was much smaller than the group of onlookers, and the Phelpsians carried signs with diverse messages against Jews, gays, Israel, and Obama. As usual, the Phelpsians did not seem to be attacking anything in particular, nor were they advocating any action. Their attitude is essentially Calvinistic: Read the rest of this entry »
Posted: June 27th, 2009 | Author: miconian | Filed under: Miconian At Large | Tags: aliens, brooklyn, cobble hill, orange sky | View Comments
The aliens will be invading soon.
These photos have not been modified, other than that the resolution was reduced so they would fit here. This is really what the sky looked like over Cobble Hill last night. People everywhere were, like me, pointing their phones at the sky. To take pictures, or to attempt communication with our new friends from another world?
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted: May 8th, 2009 | Author: miconian | Filed under: Miconian At Large | Tags: blogfest, blogging, brooklyn | View Comments
The Gothamist holds an unexpected guerrilla session on blog monetization.
Tonight was my second Brooklyn Blogfest. I had mixed feelings both this year, and last year, because: Read the rest of this entry »
Posted: June 29th, 2008 | Author: miconian | Filed under: Media And Advertising | Tags: apartments, brooklyn | View Comments
Brooklyn’s Gowanus Lounge has posted an interesting series of blog entries about an outoor apartment rental ad placement gone horribly wrong.
In placing an ad for apartment brokers above a community garden, the agency clearly thought they had made a perfect match: They were targeting neighborhood-conscious people with an ad aimed at neighborhood-conscious people. What could be simpler?
And yet, the agency didn’t consider that the ad itself would be exactly the type of eyesore that neighborhood-conscious people can’t stand to have in their neighborhood.
Physicists and anthropologists like to say that it’s not possible to observe a situation without changing it. If, for example, you go to live with indigenous people in the rainforest to study their culture, you will become a part of that culture. So what you’re observing, as an anthropologist, is what that culture is like with a person from a developed nation living in it.
It’s the same for advertising. You can’t just consider the target demographic in terms of who they are. You also have to consider them in terms of how they’ll react to your ad. Not the product you’re selling, not the ad’s “call to action,” background color, etc., but to the presence of the ad itself. To the fact that it exists, taking up a certain specific space in the consumer’s line of sight. Is that okay with them?
What are some ways this agency might have presented an ad for the same service, in the same location, while avoiding the hostile reaction?
garden spider (get it?) photo by General Wesc
